🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.